{"id":1062,"date":"2024-09-07T14:43:58","date_gmt":"2024-09-07T17:43:58","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.globalcrossings.com.br\/?p=1062"},"modified":"2024-09-07T14:43:58","modified_gmt":"2024-09-07T17:43:58","slug":"newsletter-do-projeto-global-crossings-agosto-2024","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.globalcrossings.com.br\/en\/2024\/09\/07\/newsletter-do-projeto-global-crossings-agosto-2024\/","title":{"rendered":"NEWSLETTER DO PROJETO GLOBAL CROSSINGS AGOSTO\/2024"},"content":{"rendered":"\n<p><strong>NEWSLETTER AGOSTO\/2024<\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n<p><strong><em>C\u00c1TEDRA JEAN MONNET UNIVERSIDADE FEDERAL DE UBERL\u00c2NDIA<\/em><\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n<p><strong>&nbsp;PROJETO GLOBAL CROSSINGS<\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n<p><strong>COORDENA\u00c7\u00c3O:&nbsp;<\/strong>PROFA. CLAUDIA LOUREIRO<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p><strong>ORGANIZA\u00c7\u00c3O E EDI\u00c7\u00c3O:&nbsp;<\/strong>PEDRO LUCCHETTI; THIAGO ROMERO<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p><strong>NOT\u00cdCIAS DA UNI\u00c3O EUROPEIA<\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n<p><strong>UNI\u00c3O EUROPEIA NO COMBATE AOS INC\u00caNDIOS FLORESTAIS<\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>Danielle Mansur Guimar\u00e3es<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>Os inc\u00eandios florestais em Portugal, Fran\u00e7a, Espanha, Gr\u00e9cia, Alb\u00e2nia e outros pa\u00edses da Uni\u00e3o Europeia t\u00eam se tornado cada vez mais frequentes e devastadores, impulsionados pelas mudan\u00e7as clim\u00e1ticas e pela degrada\u00e7\u00e3o dos ecossistemas. Estes eventos n\u00e3o s\u00f3 causam destrui\u00e7\u00e3o ambiental, mas tamb\u00e9m colocam em risco vidas humanas, vidas n\u00e3o humanas, ecossistemas inteiros. O fogo tamb\u00e9m devasta infraestruturas cruciais, como estradas e outras redes essenciais ao pleno funcionamento das cidades.&nbsp;<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>Diante desse cen\u00e1rio alarmante, o trabalho de preven\u00e7\u00e3o de inc\u00eandios torna-se crucial. A Uni\u00e3o Europeia, por meio do Mecanismo de Prote\u00e7\u00e3o Civil e do programa rescEU, tem refor\u00e7ado suas capacidades para prevenir e responder a esses desastres. A preven\u00e7\u00e3o \u00e9 vista como uma prioridade, envolvendo desde a avalia\u00e7\u00e3o de riscos at\u00e9 o desenvolvimento de sistemas de alerta precoce.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>O&nbsp;<strong>rescEU<\/strong>&nbsp;foi criado como uma reserva estrat\u00e9gica de recursos da UE, financiada integralmente pela Uni\u00e3o, incluindo uma frota de avi\u00f5es e helic\u00f3pteros de combate a inc\u00eandios, al\u00e9m de capacidades m\u00e9dicas, de evacua\u00e7\u00e3o e de resposta a emerg\u00eancias qu\u00edmicas, biol\u00f3gicas, radiol\u00f3gicas e nucleares.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>Na pr\u00e1tica, quando um inc\u00eandio de grandes propor\u00e7\u00f5es ocorre, os Estados-membros podem solicitar assist\u00eancia atrav\u00e9s do Mecanismo de Prote\u00e7\u00e3o Civil da UE. O&nbsp;<strong>rescEU<\/strong>&nbsp;entra em a\u00e7\u00e3o ao mobilizar rapidamente recursos e equipes especializadas que s\u00e3o estrategicamente posicionadas em diferentes pa\u00edses europeus. Em 2024, por exemplo, 24 avi\u00f5es e 4 helic\u00f3pteros de combate a inc\u00eandios foram disponibilizados por Estados como Chipre, Espanha, Fran\u00e7a, It\u00e1lia e Portugal. Al\u00e9m disso, 556 bombeiros de 12 pa\u00edses est\u00e3o preposicionados em locais cr\u00edticos para garantir uma resposta r\u00e1pida e eficaz.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>No entanto, mesmo com os melhores esfor\u00e7os, impedir completamente os inc\u00eandios muitas vezes n\u00e3o \u00e9 poss\u00edvel. \u00c9 por isso que a UE investe em sistemas complexos para mitigar os impactos quando esses eventos ocorrem. A coopera\u00e7\u00e3o entre Estados-membros \u00e9 fundamental para garantir uma resposta r\u00e1pida e eficiente, minimizando danos ao meio ambiente e protegendo as popula\u00e7\u00f5es.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>A solidariedade entre na\u00e7\u00f5es soberanas dentro da UE \u00e9 um pilar essencial na luta contra os inc\u00eandios florestais, mostrando que a uni\u00e3o \u00e9 a chave para enfrentar desafios que ultrapassam fronteiras.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>REFER\u00caNCIAS:&nbsp;<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p><strong>EU deploys assistance to combat wildfires in Greece and Albania<\/strong>.&nbsp;Dispon\u00edvel em: https:\/\/civil-protection-humanitarian-aid.ec.europa.eu\/news-stories\/news\/eu-deploys-assistance-combat-wildfires-greece-and-albania-2024-08-13_en. Acesso em: 28 ago. 2024.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>\u200c<strong>EU mobilises assistance for wildfires in Madeira, Portugal<\/strong>. Dispon\u00edvel em: https:\/\/civil-protection-humanitarian-aid.ec.europa.eu\/news-stories\/news\/eu-mobilises-assistance-wildfires-madeira-portugal-2024-08-22_en. Acesso em: 28 ago. 2024.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>\u200c<strong>rescEU<\/strong>. Dispon\u00edvel em: https:\/\/civil-protection-humanitarian-aid.ec.europa.eu\/what\/civil-protection\/resceu_en.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>\u200c<strong>EU Civil Protection Mechanism<\/strong>. Dispon\u00edvel em: https:\/\/civil-protection-humanitarian-aid.ec.europa.eu\/what\/civil-protection\/eu-civil-protection-mechanism_en.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>\u200c<strong>Emergency Response Coordination Centre (ERCC)<\/strong>.&nbsp;Dispon\u00edvel em: https:\/\/civil-protection-humanitarian-aid.ec.europa.eu\/what\/civil-protection\/emergency-response-coordination-centre-ercc_en.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>\u200c<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>THEMATIC AXIS:&nbsp;CLIMATE CHANGE AND ECOCIDE<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p><strong>EUROPEAN UNION IN THE FIGHT AGAINST FOREST FIRES<\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>Danielle Mansur Guimar\u00e3es<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>Wildfires in Portugal, France, Spain, Greece, Albania and other European Union countries have become increasingly frequent and devastating, driven by climate change and ecosystem degradation. These events not only cause environmental destruction, but also endanger human lives, non-human lives and entire ecosystems. The fires also devastate crucial infrastructure, such as roads and other networks essential to the full functioning of cities.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>Given this alarming scenario, fire prevention work becomes crucial. The European Union, through the Civil Protection Mechanism and the&nbsp;<strong>rescEU<\/strong>&nbsp;program, has been strengthening its capacity to prevent and respond to these disasters. Prevention is seen as a priority, involving everything from risk assessment to the development of early warning systems.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p><strong>RescEU<\/strong>&nbsp;was created as a strategic reserve of EU resources, fully funded by the Union, including a fleet of firefighting planes and helicopters, as well as medical, evacuation, and response capacities for chemical, biological, radiological, and nuclear emergencies.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>In practice, when a large-scale fire occurs, member states can request assistance through the EU Civil Protection Mechanism. RescEU is activated to quickly mobilize resources and specialized teams that are strategically positioned in different European countries. In 2024, for example, 24 firefighting planes and 4 helicopters were made available by countries such as Cyprus, Spain, France, Italy, and Portugal. Additionally, 556 firefighters from 12 countries were prepositioned in critical locations to ensure a swift and effective response.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>However, even with the best efforts, it is often not possible to completely prevent fires. That is why the EU invests in complex systems to mitigate the impacts when these events occur. Cooperation among member states is essential to ensure a rapid and efficient response, minimizing environmental damage and protecting populations.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>Solidarity among sovereign nations within the EU is a key pillar in the fight against wildfires, showing that unity is the key to facing challenges that cross borders.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>REFERENCES:<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p><strong>EU deploys assistance to combat wildfires in Greece and Albania<\/strong>.&nbsp;Dispon\u00edvel em: https:\/\/civil-protection-humanitarian-aid.ec.europa.eu\/news-stories\/news\/eu-deploys-assistance-combat-wildfires-greece-and-albania-2024-08-13_en. Acesso em: 28 ago. 2024.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>\u200c<strong>EU mobilises assistance for wildfires in Madeira, Portugal<\/strong>. Dispon\u00edvel em: https:\/\/civil-protection-humanitarian-aid.ec.europa.eu\/news-stories\/news\/eu-mobilises-assistance-wildfires-madeira-portugal-2024-08-22_en. Acesso em: 28 ago. 2024.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>\u200c<strong>rescEU<\/strong>. Dispon\u00edvel em: https:\/\/civil-protection-humanitarian-aid.ec.europa.eu\/what\/civil-protection\/resceu_en.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>\u200c<strong>EU Civil Protection Mechanism<\/strong>. Dispon\u00edvel em: https:\/\/civil-protection-humanitarian-aid.ec.europa.eu\/what\/civil-protection\/eu-civil-protection-mechanism_en.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>\u200c<strong>Emergency Response Coordination Centre (ERCC)<\/strong>.&nbsp;Dispon\u00edvel em: https:\/\/civil-protection-humanitarian-aid.ec.europa.eu\/what\/civil-protection\/emergency-response-coordination-centre-ercc_en.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>EIXO:&nbsp;Cidadania Global<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p><strong>CIDADANIA EM MOVIMENTO: DE FRONTEIRAS NACIONAIS A CIDADES GLOBAIS NA UNI\u00c3O EUROPEIA<\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>Roberta Soeiro de Moraes Souza<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>A cidadania da Uni\u00e3o Europeia amadureceu, significativamente, como uma institui\u00e7\u00e3o, em grande parte devido \u00e0s interven\u00e7\u00f5es relevantes do Tribunal de Justi\u00e7a da Uni\u00e3o Europeia, nos \u00faltimos anos, al\u00e9m de novas iniciativas legislativas, que ajudaram a moldar a identidade europeia.&nbsp;<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>No artigo &#8220;European Union Citizenship: Writing the Future&#8221;, Dora Kostakopoulouv (2007) analisa a evolu\u00e7\u00e3o e o potencial futuro da cidadania na Uni\u00e3o Europeia. A autora argumenta que, impulsionada por decis\u00f5es judiciais e reformas legislativas, a cidadania europeia tem o potencial de transformar a rela\u00e7\u00e3o entre os cidad\u00e3os e a Uni\u00e3o Europeia.&nbsp;<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>Houve, assim, reformas legislativas significativas, como no caso das iniciativas, voltadas \u00e0 melhoria da pol\u00edtica de asilo do bloco, como a Revis\u00e3o do Regulamento de Dublin e o desenvolvimento de um sistema comum de asilo, a fim de garantir a prote\u00e7\u00e3o dos direitos dos solicitantes de asilo e fomentando a distribui\u00e7\u00e3o das responsabilidades de forma mais equitativa entre os Estados-Membros.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>Kostakopoulou (2007) enfatiza a necessidade de repensar esse conceito para promover uma identidade europeia mais inclusiva e participativa, capaz de enfrentar desafios contempor\u00e2neos como mobilidade e diversidade cultural. Ela conclui que, para que a cidadania europeia atinja todo o seu potencial, \u00e9 crucial continuar a adaptar e expandir suas bases institucionais e normativas, expandindo-se seus direitos e responsabilidades, ajustando suas bases normativas.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>A evolu\u00e7\u00e3o da cidadania da Uni\u00e3o Europeia tem como ponto de partida o Tratado de Maastricht, em 1992, um marco, sendo a primeira vez que se estabeleceu uma cidadania al\u00e9m do Estado-na\u00e7\u00e3o, desafiando a exclusividade da cidadania nacional. No entanto, essa inova\u00e7\u00e3o n\u00e3o capturou amplamente a imagina\u00e7\u00e3o pol\u00edtica, sendo muitas vezes vista como uma institui\u00e7\u00e3o simb\u00f3lica e decorativa devido \u00e0 sua abrang\u00eancia limitada. Originalmente, a cidadania europeia baseava-se nos direitos de livre circula\u00e7\u00e3o e resid\u00eancia j\u00e1 existentes no direito comunit\u00e1rio, acrescentando poucos novos direitos, al\u00e9m dos eleitorais e de prote\u00e7\u00e3o consular e diplom\u00e1tica.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>A cidadania da Uni\u00e3o Europeia n\u00e3o replica a cidadania nacional. Enquanto esta \u00faltima denota plena participa\u00e7\u00e3o na comunidade nacional, a cidadania europeia estava inicialmente ligada \u00e0 mobilidade laboral e \u00e0 cria\u00e7\u00e3o de um mercado interno, evoluindo para refletir preocupa\u00e7\u00f5es sobre como novas institui\u00e7\u00f5es econ\u00f4micas poderiam se enraizar em comunidades concretas, transformando o mercado \u00fanico em uma Europa dos cidad\u00e3os. O Tratado de Maastricht associou os direitos de livre circula\u00e7\u00e3o e resid\u00eancia ao status pol\u00edtico de cidad\u00e3o da Uni\u00e3o, contribuindo para uma transforma\u00e7\u00e3o conceitual desses direitos. A cidadania da Uni\u00e3o traz consigo a expectativa de tratamento igual em toda a UE, independentemente da nacionalidade, mas esse processo \u00e9 repleto de ambiguidades, contradi\u00e7\u00f5es e tens\u00f5es.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>A intera\u00e7\u00e3o entre a cidadania nacional e a da Uni\u00e3o Europeia \u00e9 interdependente, com cada uma influenciando e sendo transformada pela outra. Embora os la\u00e7os nacionais sejam importantes para as pessoas, n\u00e3o se pode ignorar a crescente transforma\u00e7\u00e3o dos trabalhadores migrantes em cidad\u00e3os da Uni\u00e3o, com amplos direitos de igualdade de tratamento no Estado-membro em que residem, e o crescente prest\u00edgio da cidadania da Uni\u00e3o. O desenvolvimento dessa cidadania permite repensar e transformar a cidadania em termos mais cr\u00edticos e institucionais, promovendo um modelo que melhora as oportunidades de vida dos cidad\u00e3os ao eliminar formas desnecess\u00e1rias de discrimina\u00e7\u00e3o.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>No contexto da Uni\u00e3o Europeia, a cidadania global envolve uma identidade que transcende as fronteiras nacionais e um compromisso com valores universais e responsabilidades compartilhadas em quest\u00f5es globais. Entre suas caracter\u00edsticas principais, destacam-se a identidade transnacional, o respeito \u00e0 diversidade cultural, o engajamento ativo e a participa\u00e7\u00e3o c\u00edvica, al\u00e9m de uma educa\u00e7\u00e3o voltada para a conscientiza\u00e7\u00e3o cr\u00edtica.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>Segundo Saskia Sassen (2001), as cidades globais, como Londres, Paris, Bruxelas e Berlim, tornam-se fundamentais nesse cen\u00e1rio, pois funcionam como centros de interc\u00e2mbio cultural e econ\u00f4mico, espa\u00e7os de inova\u00e7\u00e3o e solu\u00e7\u00f5es globais, e promotoras de direitos humanos e inclus\u00e3o. Elas oferecem acesso a redes globais e modelos de governan\u00e7a multin\u00edvel, materializando os princ\u00edpios de uma cidadania global de forma concreta.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>Refer\u00eancias<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>APPIAH, Kwame Anthony.&nbsp;<strong>Cosmopolitanism<\/strong>: Ethics in a World of Strangers. New York: W.W. Norton &amp; Company, 2006.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>BLOMLEY, Nicholas.&nbsp;<strong>Law, Property, and the Geography of Violence<\/strong>: The Frontier, the Survey, and the Grid. Annals of the Association of American Geographers, v. 93, n. 1, p. 121-141, 2003.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>COMMISSION OF THE EUROPEAN COMMUNITIES.&nbsp;<strong>The New European Citizenship<\/strong>. Brussels: European Commission, 1997.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>KOSTAKOPOULOU, Dora.&nbsp;<strong>European Union Citizenship<\/strong>: Writing the Future. European Law Journal, v. 13, n. 5, p. 623-646, 2007.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>SASSEN, Saskia.&nbsp;<strong>The Global City<\/strong>: New York, London, Tokyo. 2. ed. Princeton: Princeton University Press, 2001.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>UNESCO.&nbsp;<strong>Educa\u00e7\u00e3o para a cidadania global<\/strong>: preparando os aprendentes para os desafios do s\u00e9culo XXI. Paris: UNESCO, 2014. Dispon\u00edvel em: https:\/\/unesdoc.unesco.org\/ark:\/48223\/pf0000227729.&nbsp;Acesso em: 27 ago. 2024.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>UNITED NATIONS HABITAT.&nbsp;<strong>The State of the World&#8217;s Cities 2008\/2009<\/strong>: Harmonious Cities.&nbsp;London: Earthscan, 2008. Dispon\u00edvel em: https:\/\/unhabitat.org\/books\/state-of-the-worlds-cities-20082009-harmonious-cities. Acesso em: 27 ago. 2024.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p><strong>CITIZENSHIP ON THE MOVE: FROM NATIONAL BORDERS TO GLOBAL CITIES IN THE EUROPEAN UNION<\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>Roberta Soeiro de Moraes Souza<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>European Union citizenship has significantly matured as an institution, largely due to relevant interventions by the Court of Justice of the European Union in recent years, as well as new legislative initiatives that have helped shape European identity.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>In the article &#8220;European Union Citizenship: Writing the Future,&#8221; Dora Kostakopoulou (2007) analyzes the evolution and future potential of EU citizenship. The author argues that, driven by judicial decisions and legislative reforms, European citizenship has the potential to transform the relationship between citizens and the European Union. Significant legislative reforms, such as initiatives to improve the EU&#8217;s asylum policy, including the Review of the Dublin Regulation and the development of a common asylum system, have been implemented to ensure the protection of asylum seekers&#8217; rights and to promote a more equitable distribution of responsibilities among member states.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>Kostakopoulou (2007) emphasizes the need to rethink this concept to promote a more inclusive and participatory European identity, capable of addressing contemporary challenges such as mobility and cultural diversity. She concludes that, for EU citizenship to reach its full potential, it is crucial to continue adapting and expanding its institutional and normative foundations, broadening its rights and responsibilities, and adjusting its normative bases.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>The evolution of EU citizenship began with the Maastricht Treaty in 1992, marking the first time a citizenship beyond the nation-state was established, challenging the exclusivity of national citizenship. However, this innovation did not widely capture political imagination, often being viewed as a symbolic and decorative institution due to its limited scope. Originally, EU citizenship was based on existing Community law rights of free movement and residence, adding few new rights beyond electoral and consular protection.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>EU citizenship does not replicate national citizenship. While the latter denotes full participation in the national community, EU citizenship was initially linked to labor mobility and the creation of an internal market, evolving to reflect concerns about how new economic institutions could become rooted in concrete communities, transforming the single market into a Europe of citizens. The Maastricht Treaty tied the rights of free movement and residence to the political status of Union citizens, contributing to a conceptual transformation of these rights. EU citizenship carries the expectation of equal treatment throughout the EU, regardless of nationality, but this process is fraught with ambiguities, contradictions, and tensions.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>The interaction between national citizenship and EU citizenship is interdependent, with each influencing and being transformed by the other. While national ties are important to people, the increasing transformation of migrant workers into Union citizens, with broad rights of equal treatment in their member state of residence, and the growing prestige of EU citizenship cannot be ignored. The development of this citizenship allows for a rethinking and transformation of citizenship in more critical and institutional terms, promoting a model that enhances citizens&#8217; life chances by eliminating unnecessary forms of discrimination.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>In the context of the European Union, global citizenship involves an identity that transcends national borders and a commitment to universal values and shared responsibilities on global issues. Key characteristics include transnational identity, respect for cultural diversity, active engagement and civic participation, as well as education aimed at critical awareness.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>According to Saskia Sassen (2001), global cities such as London, Paris, Brussels, and Berlin become fundamental in this scenario as they serve as centers of cultural and economic exchange, spaces for innovation and global solutions, and promoters of human rights and inclusion. They provide access to global networks and multi-level governance models, concretely embodying the principles of global citizenship.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>References<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>APPIAH, Kwame Anthony. Cosmopolitanism: Ethics in a World of Strangers. New York: W.W. Norton &amp; Company, 2006.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>BLOMLEY, Nicholas. Law, Property, and the Geography of Violence: The Frontier, the Survey, and the Grid. Annals of the Association of American Geographers, v. 93, n. 1, p. 121-141, 2003.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>COMMISSION OF THE EUROPEAN COMMUNITIES. The New European Citizenship. Brussels: European Commission, 1997.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>KOSTAKOPOULOU, Dora. European Union Citizenship: Writing the Future. European Law Journal, v. 13, n. 5, p. 623-646, 2007.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>SASSEN, Saskia. The Global City: New York, London, Tokyo. 2. ed. Princeton: Princeton University Press, 2001.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>UNESCO. Educa\u00e7\u00e3o para a cidadania global: preparando os aprendentes para os desafios do s\u00e9culo XXI.&nbsp;Paris: UNESCO, 2014. Available at:: https:\/\/unesdoc.unesco.org\/ark:\/48223\/pf0000227729. Accessed: on: August 27, 2024.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>UNITED NATIONS HABITAT. The State of the World&#8217;s Cities 2008\/2009: Harmonious Cities. London: Earthscan, 2008. Available at: https:\/\/unhabitat.org\/books\/state-of-the-worlds-cities-20082009-harmonious-cities. .&nbsp;Accessed: on: August 27, 2024.<strong><\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n<p><strong>______________________________________________________________________<\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n<ul class=\"wp-block-list\">\n<li>TRIBUNAL DE JUSTI\u00c7A DA UNI\u00c3O EUROPEIA<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n\n\n\n<p>EIXO:&nbsp;MUDAN\u00c7AS CLIM\u00c1TICAS E ECOC\u00cdCIO<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p><strong>ONGS PROCESSAM COMISS\u00c3O EUROPEIA POR METAS CLIM\u00c1TICAS INSUFICIENTES E INCOMPAT\u00cdVEIS COM O ACORDO DE PARIS<\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>Roberta Soeiro de Moraes Souza<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>A CAN Europe e a Global Legal Action Network (GLAN) est\u00e3o processando a Comiss\u00e3o Europeia, no Tribunal de Justi\u00e7a da Uni\u00e3o Europeia, solicitando a anula\u00e7\u00e3o da decis\u00e3o que rejeitou o pedido de reexame interno das metas de emiss\u00f5es de gases de efeito estufa, conforme o artigo 10.\u00ba do Regulamento Aarhus. Esse regulamento aborda o acesso \u00e0 informa\u00e7\u00e3o, a participa\u00e7\u00e3o p\u00fablica nas decis\u00f5es ambientais e o acesso \u00e0 justi\u00e7a junto \u00e0s institui\u00e7\u00f5es da UE. As ONGs afirmam que as metas atuais (definidas pela Comiss\u00e3o Europeia) s\u00e3o insuficientes para proteger os direitos humanos fundamentais e n\u00e3o est\u00e3o alinhadas com o Acordo de Paris, que visa limitar o aquecimento global a 1,5\u00b0C.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>O processo envolve setores como edif\u00edcios, agricultura, res\u00edduos, pequenas ind\u00fastrias e transportes, respons\u00e1veis por cerca de 57% das emiss\u00f5es da UE. Em 2023, as metas foram revisadas com o pacote &#8220;Fit for 55&#8221;, estabelecendo uma redu\u00e7\u00e3o de 55% nas emiss\u00f5es at\u00e9 2030, comparado aos n\u00edveis de 1990. No entanto, as ONGs alegam que essas revis\u00f5es s\u00e3o &#8220;grosseiramente inadequadas&#8221; e violam o direito ambiental, pois n\u00e3o s\u00e3o baseadas na melhor ci\u00eancia dispon\u00edvel.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>As organiza\u00e7\u00f5es ent\u00e3o apresentaram dois fundamentos principais: o primeiro alega que a Comiss\u00e3o Europeia errou ao considerar inadmiss\u00edvel parte do pedido de reexame interno, aplicando um crit\u00e9rio jur\u00eddico incorreto e cometendo erros de avalia\u00e7\u00e3o. O segundo fundamento aponta que a decis\u00e3o impugnada avaliou incorretamente os motivos apresentados para o reexame da Decis\u00e3o de Execu\u00e7\u00e3o (UE) 2023\/1319, dividindo-se em quatro partes que demonstram falhas jur\u00eddicas e de aprecia\u00e7\u00e3o.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>Na primeira parte, argumentam que a decis\u00e3o errou ao n\u00e3o reconhecer a obriga\u00e7\u00e3o legal de avaliar as redu\u00e7\u00f5es globais de emiss\u00f5es necess\u00e1rias para limitar o aquecimento a 1,5\u00b0C, incluindo a viabilidade de tecnologias de remo\u00e7\u00e3o de CO\u2082. Na segunda parte, afirmam que a Uni\u00e3o Europeia tem a obriga\u00e7\u00e3o de estabelecer metas de emiss\u00f5es para 2030 que sejam consistentes com uma participa\u00e7\u00e3o justa nas redu\u00e7\u00f5es globais necess\u00e1rias. Na terceira parte, sustentam que a Uni\u00e3o deve buscar internamente todas as redu\u00e7\u00f5es de emiss\u00f5es poss\u00edveis at\u00e9 2030, mas a decis\u00e3o impugnada rejeitou esse argumento. Na quarta parte, destacam que a decis\u00e3o falhou ao n\u00e3o considerar os impactos das mudan\u00e7as clim\u00e1ticas nos direitos fundamentais, nem avaliar como as metas de emiss\u00f5es da UE contribuem para essas mudan\u00e7as.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>As ONGs esperam, por fim, que a Corte anule a decis\u00e3o da Comiss\u00e3o e revise as metas de aloca\u00e7\u00e3o de emiss\u00f5es (AEAs), exigindo a\u00e7\u00f5es mais ambiciosas e alinhadas com o limite de 1,5\u00b0C do Acordo de Paris. A a\u00e7\u00e3o busca acelerar a ambi\u00e7\u00e3o clim\u00e1tica da UE, pressionando por redu\u00e7\u00f5es de emiss\u00f5es de pelo menos 65% at\u00e9 2030. A decis\u00e3o da Corte Europeia de Direitos Humanos no caso \u201cKlimaseniorinnen\u201d, que condenou a Su\u00ed\u00e7a por n\u00e3o cortar emiss\u00f5es suficientes, pode influenciar o julgamento. Com o caso priorit\u00e1rio, espera-se que o julgamento ocorra at\u00e9 2025, com a Corte acelerando o processo devido \u00e0 urg\u00eancia da quest\u00e3o ambiental. As ONGs tamb\u00e9m pedem que a Comiss\u00e3o arque com as despesas do processo.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p><strong>Refer\u00eancias<\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>CLIMATE ACTION NETWORK EUROPE (CAN-Europa).&nbsp;<strong>Ambi\u00e7\u00e3o Clim\u00e1tica<\/strong>. Dispon\u00edvel em:&nbsp;<a href=\"https:\/\/caneurope.org\/court-against-european-commission-climate-ambition\/\">https:\/\/caneurope.org\/court-against-european-commission-climate-ambition\/<\/a>.&nbsp;Acesso em: 29\/08\/2024.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>KAMINSKI, ISABELLA.&nbsp;<strong>Ativistas processam a UE por metas clim\u00e1ticas de 2030 &#8216;grosseiramente inadequadas\u2019.&nbsp;<\/strong>The Guardian. 27\/08\/2024. Dispon\u00edvel em:&nbsp;<a href=\"https:\/\/www.theguardian.com\/environment\/article\/2024\/aug\/27\/campaigners-sue-eu-over-grossly-inadequate-2030-climate-targets\">https:\/\/www.theguardian.com\/environment\/article\/2024\/aug\/27\/campaigners-sue-eu-over-grossly-inadequate-2030-climate-targets<\/a>.&nbsp;Acesso em: 29\/08\/2024.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>TRIBUNAL DE JUSTI\u00c7A DA UNI\u00c3O EUROPEIA. Infocuria. Jurisprud\u00eancia.&nbsp;<strong>Processo T-120\/24<\/strong>. Dispon\u00edvel em:&nbsp;<a href=\"https:\/\/curia.europa.eu\/juris\/document\/document.jsf?text=&amp;docid=286085&amp;pageIndex=0&amp;doclang=PT&amp;mode=lst&amp;dir=&amp;occ=first&amp;part=1&amp;cid=6302116\">https:\/\/curia.europa.eu\/juris\/document\/document.jsf?text=&amp;docid=286085&amp;pageIndex=0&amp;doclang=PT&amp;mode=lst&amp;dir=&amp;occ=first&amp;part=1&amp;cid=6302116<\/a>.&nbsp;Acesso em: 29\/08\/2024.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p><strong>NGOS SUE EUROPEAN COMMISSION OVER INSUFFICIENT CLIMATE TARGETS INCOMPATIBLE WITH THE PARIS AGREEMENT<\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>Roberta Soeiro de Moraes Souza<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>CAN Europe and the Global Legal Action Network (GLAN) are suing the European Commission at the Court of Justice of the European Union, seeking the annulment of the decision that rejected their request for internal review of greenhouse gas emission targets, under Article 10 of the Aarhus Regulation. This regulation addresses access to information, public participation in environmental decision-making, and access to justice with EU institutions. The NGOs argue that the current targets (set by the European Commission) are insufficient to protect fundamental human rights and are not aligned with the Paris Agreement, which aims to limit global warming to 1.5\u00b0C.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>The lawsuit involves sectors such as buildings, agriculture, waste, small industries, and transport, which are responsible for about 57% of EU emissions. In 2023, the targets were revised under the &#8220;Fit for 55&#8221; package, setting a 55% reduction in emissions by 2030 compared to 1990 levels. However, the NGOs argue that these revisions are &#8220;grossly inadequate&#8221; and violate environmental law, as they are not based on the best available science.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>The organizations presented two main grounds: the first argues that the European Commission erred by deeming part of the internal review request inadmissible, applying an incorrect legal criterion and making assessment errors. The second ground contends that the contested decision incorrectly evaluated the reasons presented for reviewing Implementing Decision (EU) 2023\/1319, divided into four parts demonstrating legal and assessment flaws.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>In the first part, they argue that the decision erred by not recognizing the legal obligation to assess the necessary global emission reductions to limit warming to 1.5\u00b0C, including the feasibility of carbon dioxide removal technologies. In the second part, they claim that the European Union is obligated to set emission targets for 2030 that are consistent with a fair share of the required global reductions. In the third part, they argue that the EU must internally achieve all possible emission reductions by 2030, but the contested decision rejected this argument. In the fourth part, they highlight that the decision failed to consider the impacts of climate change on fundamental rights or assess how the EU&#8217;s emission targets contribute to these changes.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>The NGOs hope that the Court will ultimately annul the Commission\u2019s decision and revise the annual emission allocations (AEAs), requiring more ambitious actions aligned with the 1.5\u00b0C limit of the Paris Agreement. The action aims to accelerate the EU\u2019s climate ambition, pushing for emission reductions of at least 65% by 2030. The European Court of Human Rights&#8217; decision in the \u201cKlimaseniorinnen\u201d case, which condemned Switzerland for not cutting emissions sufficiently, could influence the judgment. With the case marked as a priority, the hearing is expected by 2025, with the Court expediting the process due to the urgency of the environmental issue. The NGOs also request that the Commission bear the costs of the proceedings.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p><strong>References<\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>CLIMATE ACTION NETWORK EUROPE (CAN-Europe). Climate Ambition. Available at:&nbsp;<a href=\"https:\/\/caneurope.org\/court-against-european-commission-climate-ambition\/\">https:\/\/caneurope.org\/court-against-european-commission-climate-ambition\/<\/a>. Accessed on: 08\/29\/2024.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>KAMINSKI, ISABELLA. Campaigners Sue EU Over \u2018Grossly Inadequate\u2019 2030 Climate Targets. The Guardian. 08\/27\/2024. Available at:&nbsp;<a href=\"https:\/\/www.theguardian.com\/environment\/article\/2024\/aug\/27\/campaigners-sue-eu-over-grossly-inadequate-2030-climate-targets\">https:\/\/www.theguardian.com\/environment\/article\/2024\/aug\/27\/campaigners-sue-eu-over-grossly-inadequate-2030-climate-targets<\/a>. Accessed on: 08\/29\/2024.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>COURT OF JUSTICE OF THE EUROPEAN UNION. Infocuria. Jurisprudence. Case T-120\/24. Available at:&nbsp;<a href=\"https:\/\/curia.europa.eu\/juris\/document\/document.jsf?text=&amp;docid=286085&amp;pageIndex=0&amp;doclang=EN&amp;mode=lst&amp;dir=&amp;occ=first&amp;part=1&amp;cid=6302116\">https:\/\/curia.europa.eu\/juris\/document\/document.jsf?text=&amp;docid=286085&amp;pageIndex=0&amp;doclang=EN&amp;mode=lst&amp;dir=&amp;occ=first&amp;part=1&amp;cid=6302116<\/a>.&nbsp;Accessed on: 08\/29\/2024.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p><strong>\u00ad\u00ad\u00ad\u00ad\u00ad\u00ad\u00ad\u00ad\u00ad\u00ad______________________________________________________________________<\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n<p><strong>TRIBUNAIS INTERNACIONAIS<\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n<ul class=\"wp-block-list\">\n<li>CORTE EUROPEIA DE DIREITOS HUMANOS<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n\n\n\n<p>EIXO:<strong>&nbsp;&nbsp;<\/strong>TRANSHUMANIDADE<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p><strong>COMUNICA\u00c7\u00c3O DE CASOS \u00c0 TURQUIA<\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>Jessyca Beatriz Rodrigues Lopes<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>Em vias de an\u00e1lise, nos \u00faltimos dias temos acompanhado o caso \u2018Pavel Durov\u2019 CEO do aplicativo Telegram que foi preso na Fran\u00e7a e, mesmo ap\u00f3s o pagamento da fian\u00e7a, continua recluso.&nbsp;<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>Comparamos, ent\u00e3o, com o Caso apresentado \u00e0 Corte contra o Governo da Turquia. Com o t\u00edtulo de Comunica\u00e7\u00e3o de Casos \u00e0 Turquia &#8211; o Tribunal deu ci\u00eancia ao Governo turco de mais de 1000 pedidos referentes a condena\u00e7\u00f5es por filia\u00e7\u00e3o a uma organiza\u00e7\u00e3o terrorista armada, com base no uso do aplicativo de mensagens criptografadas chamado&nbsp;<em>ByLock.<\/em><\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>\u201cAs principais quest\u00f5es levantadas pelos requerentes j\u00e1 foram julgadas no caso da Grande C\u00e2mara do Tribunal&nbsp;&nbsp;<em>Y\u00fcksel Yal\u00e7\u0131nkaya v. T\u00fcrkiye<\/em>. Nesse julgamento, o Tribunal destacou que havia mais de 8.000 pedidos na pauta do Tribunal envolvendo queixas semelhantes. Esses 1.000 pedidos aparentemente compar\u00e1veis \u200b\u200bs\u00e3o o terceiro lote a ser notificado ao Governo turco. Nesse contexto, o Tribunal decidiu n\u00e3o fazer perguntas \u00e0s partes ou exigir quaisquer observa\u00e7\u00f5es sobre os pedidos.\u201d<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>O Tribunal julgou que \u201cEstado respondente \u00e9 obrigado a tomar medidas gerais para resolver problema sist\u00eamico relacionado \u00e0 abordagem dos tribunais nacionais ao uso do ByLock.\u201d<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>Ainda;<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>\u201cO Tribunal reconheceu que o ByLock n\u00e3o era apenas um aplicativo de mensagens comerciais comum e que seu uso poderia sugerir&nbsp;<em>prima facie&nbsp;<\/em>algum tipo de conex\u00e3o com o movimento G\u00fclen (Movimento da sociedade civil na Turquia). No entanto, o ato penalizado pelo Artigo 314 \u00a7 2 n\u00e3o era mera conex\u00e3o com uma rede supostamente criminosa, mas a filia\u00e7\u00e3o a uma organiza\u00e7\u00e3o terrorista armada, na medida em que tal filia\u00e7\u00e3o foi estabelecida com base nos elementos constituintes \u2013 objetivos e subjetivos \u2013 estabelecidos na lei.\u201d<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>\u201cO Tribunal reconheceu que as evid\u00eancias eletr\u00f4nicas se tornaram onipresentes em julgamentos criminais em vista da crescente digitaliza\u00e7\u00e3o de todos os aspectos da vida. O recurso a evid\u00eancias eletr\u00f4nicas atestando que um indiv\u00edduo estava usando um sistema de mensagens criptografadas que foi especialmente projetado e usado exclusivamente por uma organiza\u00e7\u00e3o criminosa nas comunica\u00e7\u00f5es internas dessa organiza\u00e7\u00e3o pode ser muito importante na luta contra o crime organizado. Tamb\u00e9m observou que as evid\u00eancias eletr\u00f4nicas diferiam em muitos aspectos das formas tradicionais de evid\u00eancias e levantavam quest\u00f5es distintas de confiabilidade, pois eram inerentemente mais propensas \u00e0 destrui\u00e7\u00e3o, danos, altera\u00e7\u00f5es ou manipula\u00e7\u00e3o. O Tribunal reiterou ainda que o uso de evid\u00eancias eletr\u00f4nicas n\u00e3o testadas em processos criminais pode envolver dificuldades para o judici\u00e1rio, pois a natureza do procedimento e a tecnologia aplicada \u00e0 coleta de tais evid\u00eancias eram complexas e, portanto, podem diminuir a capacidade dos ju\u00edzes nacionais de estabelecer sua autenticidade, precis\u00e3o e integridade. Al\u00e9m disso, o manuseio de evid\u00eancias eletr\u00f4nicas, particularmente quando se tratava de dados criptografados e\/ou vastos em volume ou escopo, pode apresentar \u00e0s autoridades policiais e judiciais s\u00e9rios desafios pr\u00e1ticos e processuais tanto na fase de investiga\u00e7\u00e3o quanto na de julgamento. Dito isso, esses fatores n\u00e3o exigiam que as salvaguardas sob o Artigo 6 \u00a7 1 fossem aplicadas de forma diferente, seja de forma mais estrita ou mais branda. O Tribunal teve que avaliar se a imparcialidade geral dos procedimentos havia sido assegurada atrav\u00e9s das lentes das salvaguardas processuais e institucionais e dos princ\u00edpios fundamentais de um julgamento justo.\u201d<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p><strong><u>Refer\u00eancias&nbsp;<\/u><\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>ECHR. Communication of cases to T\u00fcrkiye.&nbsp;Dispon\u00edvel em:&nbsp;https:\/\/prd-echr.coe.int\/web\/echr\/w\/communication-of-cases-to-t%C3%BCrkiye-1.&nbsp;<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>ECHR. Y\u00fcksel Yal\u00e7\u0131nkaya v. Turquia [GC]. Dispon\u00edvel em: https:\/\/hudoc.echr.coe.int\/fre#{%22tabview%22:[%22document%22],%22itemid%22:[%22002-14187%22]}<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p><strong>CASE COMUNICATION TO TURKEY<\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>Jessyca Beatriz Rodrigues Lopes<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>In the process of analysis, in recent days we have been following the case of &#8216;Pavel Durov&#8217; CEO of the Telegram app who was arrested in France and even after paying bail he remains in prison.&nbsp;<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>We then compare it with the Case presented to the Court against the Government of T\u00fcrkiye. Entitled Communication of Cases to Turkey &#8211; the Court informed the Turkish Government of more than 1000 requests regarding convictions for membership in an armed terrorist organization, based on the use of the encrypted messaging application called ByLock.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>\u201cThe main issues raised by the applicants have already been decided in the Grand Chamber of the Court case Y\u00fcksel Yal\u00e7\u0131nkaya v. T\u00fcrkiye. In that judgment, the Court highlighted that there were more than 8,000 applications on the Court&#8217;s docket involving similar complaints. These 1,000 apparently comparable requests are the third batch to be notified to the Turkish Government. In this context, the Court decided not to ask the parties any questions or require any observations on the requests.\u201d<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>The Court ruled that \u201cthe responding State is obliged to take general measures to resolve the systemic problem related to the approach of national courts to the use of ByLock.\u201d<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>Yet;<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>\u201cThe Court recognized that ByLock was not just an ordinary commercial messaging app and that its use could prima facie suggest some kind of connection with the G\u00fclen movement (Civil Society Movement in Turkey). However, the act penalized by Article 314 \u00a7 2 was not mere connection with an allegedly criminal network, but membership in an armed terrorist organization, insofar as such membership was established on the basis of the constituent elements \u2013 objective and subjective \u2013 established in the law.&#8221;<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>\u201cThe Court recognized that electronic evidence has become ubiquitous in criminal trials in view of the increasing digitalization of all aspects of life. The use of electronic evidence proving that an individual was using an encrypted messaging system that was specially designed and used exclusively by a criminal organization in that organization&#8217;s internal communications can be very important in the fight against organized crime. It also noted that electronic evidence differed in many respects from traditional forms of evidence and raised distinct reliability issues as it was inherently more prone to destruction, damage, alteration or manipulation. The Court further reiterated that the use of untested electronic evidence in criminal proceedings may involve difficulties for the judiciary, as the nature of the procedure and the technology applied to the collection of such evidence were complex and therefore may diminish the ability of national judges to establish its authenticity, accuracy and integrity. Furthermore, the handling of electronic evidence, particularly when it involves data that is encrypted and\/or vast in volume or scope, can present law enforcement and judicial authorities with serious practical and procedural challenges at both the investigation and trial phases. That said, these factors did not require that the safeguards under Article 6 \u00a7 1 be applied differently, either more strictly or more leniently. The Court had to assess whether the overall impartiality of the proceedings had been ensured through the lens of procedural and institutional safeguards and the fundamental principles of a fair trial.\u201d<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p><strong>References<\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>ECHR. Communication of cases to T\u00fcrkiye.&nbsp;Dispon\u00edvel em: https:\/\/prd-echr.coe.int\/web\/echr\/w\/communication-of-cases-to-t%C3%BCrkiye-1.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>ECHR. Y\u00fcksel Yal\u00e7\u0131nkaya v. Turquia [GC]. Dispon\u00edvel em: https:\/\/hudoc.echr.coe.int\/fre#{%22tabview%22:[%22document%22],%22itemid%22:[%22002-14187%22]}<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p><strong>NOT\u00cdCIA DA ONU<\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>EIXO: CIDADANIA GLOBAL<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p><strong>QUEM S\u00c3O OS AP\u00c1TRIDAS?<\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n<p><strong>&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;<\/strong>Francielli Alice Nunes Coutinho<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>A nacionalidade \u00e9 o v\u00ednculo que uma pessoa possui com um Estado gerando entre eles uma rela\u00e7\u00e3o de direitos e deveres. A Declara\u00e7\u00e3o Universal dos Direitos Humanos em seu artigo 15, definiu que a nacionalidade \u00e9 um direito para todos, sem distin\u00e7\u00e3o.&nbsp;&nbsp;Ocorre que, apesar desta seguridade, milhares de pessoas encontram-se como seres ap\u00e1tridas, n\u00e3o sendo elas consideradas detentoras de direitos. Dessa forma, entende-se que as causas que levam uma pessoa a ser considerada ap\u00e1trida s\u00e3o diversas, mas que principalmente ocorre em raz\u00e3o de discrimina\u00e7\u00f5es \u00e9tnicas e religiosas.&nbsp;<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>A Conven\u00e7\u00e3o sobre o Estatuto dos Ap\u00e1tridas define os ap\u00e1tridas como sendo \u201calgu\u00e9m que n\u00e3o \u00e9 considerado nacional por nenhum Estado sob a opera\u00e7\u00e3o de sua lei\u201d. Contudo, apesar desta defini\u00e7\u00e3o, os ap\u00e1tridas ainda s\u00e3o considerados um problema invis\u00edvel, pois em raz\u00e3o da falta de acesso \u00e0 escola, \u00e0 sa\u00fade, ao lazer e outras garantias b\u00e1sicas, n\u00e3o \u00e9 f\u00e1cil identific\u00e1-los. A falta de acesso \u00e0 servi\u00e7os b\u00e1sicos demonstra a vulnerabilidade desses sujeitos, j\u00e1 que n\u00e3o possuem qualquer tipo de prote\u00e7\u00e3o social e legal, tornando-se vulner\u00e1veis a exposi\u00e7\u00e3o aos riscos e a aus\u00eancia de dignidade humana.&nbsp;<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>Nesse contexto, h\u00e1 um choque entre princ\u00edpios basilares dos direitos humanos e as Legisla\u00e7\u00f5es internas de cada Pa\u00eds, pois, para os direitos fundamentais destacam-se que todos, sem distin\u00e7\u00e3o, s\u00e3o considerados detentores de direitos. Todavia, tamb\u00e9m prevalece a legisla\u00e7\u00e3o de cada Pa\u00eds, j\u00e1 que s\u00e3o nelas que est\u00e3o descritos quais s\u00e3o as caracter\u00edsticas necess\u00e1rias para que cada um possa adquirir a nacionalidade. Para isso, em 1951, foi fundada a Ag\u00eancia da ONU para Refugiados (ACNUR), com o objetivo de identificar, prevenir, reduzir e garantir a prote\u00e7\u00e3o a esse povo. Oferecendo apoio e aux\u00edlios aos governos para implementar pol\u00edticas que reduza o n\u00famero de ap\u00e1tridas.&nbsp;<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>Com isso, alguns pa\u00edses passaram a aceitar e adentrar \u00e0 Conven\u00e7\u00e3o da ONU sobre os Ap\u00e1tridas, na expectativa de diminuir os n\u00fameros e fornecer para essas pessoas a sensa\u00e7\u00e3o de pertencimento, bem como assegurar a elas seus direitos como seres humanos. Contudo, apesar das diversas discuss\u00f5es quanto as medidas a serem tomadas, a ACNUR, no final do ano de 2023, indicou que s\u00e3o mais de 4,4 milh\u00f5es de pessoas identificadas como refugiadas pelo mundo.&nbsp;<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>Portanto, ainda h\u00e1 a necessidade de mudan\u00e7as pol\u00edticas e legislativas quanto ao tema para garantir \u00e0 essas pessoas o sentimento de reconhecimento e pertencimento, assim como a possibilidade de exercer direitos e deveres.&nbsp;<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>Refer\u00eancias:<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>ACNUR BRASIL.&nbsp;<em><strong>Ap\u00e1tridas<\/strong><\/em>. Dispon\u00edvel em:&nbsp;<a href=\"https:\/\/www.acnur.org\/portugues\/quem-ajudamos\/apatridas\/\">https:\/\/www.acnur.org\/portugues\/quem-ajudamos\/apatridas\/<\/a>. Acesso em: 5 set. 2024.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>ACNUR BRASIL.&nbsp;<em><strong>ACNUR relata progresso pelo fim da apatridia<\/strong>, 2023<\/em>. Dispon\u00edvel em:&nbsp;<a href=\"https:\/\/www.acnur.org\/portugues\/2023\/11\/06\/acnur-relata-progresso-no-combate-a-apatridia\/#:~:text=Pelo%20menos%204%2C4%20milh%C3%B5es,nas%20estat%C3%ADsticas%20nacionais\">https:\/\/www.acnur.org\/portugues\/2023\/11\/06\/acnur-relata-progresso-no-combate-a-apatridia\/#:~:text=Pelo%20menos%204%2C4%20milh%C3%B5es,nas%20estat%C3%ADsticas%20nacionais<\/a>. Acesso em: 5 set. 2024.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>COUTO, Marilia Oliveira Leite; BRASIL, Deilton Ribeiro. A nacionalidade como um direito humano e os desafios da apatridia.&nbsp;<em><strong>Cadernos de Dereito Actual<\/strong><\/em>, n. 13, p. 117-131, 2020. ISSN 2340-860X. ISSNe 2386-5229. Dispon\u00edvel em:&nbsp;<a href=\"https:\/\/cadernosdedereitoactual.es\/ojs\/index.php\/cadernos\/article\/view\/460\/271\">https:\/\/cadernosdedereitoactual.es\/ojs\/index.php\/cadernos\/article\/view\/460\/271<\/a>. Acesso em: 5 set. 2024.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>HUSEK, Carlos Roberto. Nacionalidade. In: CAMPILONGO, Celso Fernandes; GONZAGA, Alvaro de Azevedo; FREIRE, Andr\u00e9 Luiz (coords.).&nbsp;<em><strong>Enciclop\u00e9dia jur\u00eddica da PUC-SP<\/strong><\/em>. Tomo: Direito Internacional. Coord. de tomo: Cl\u00e1udio Finkelstein; Clarisse Laupman Ferraz Lima. 1. ed. S\u00e3o Paulo: Pontif\u00edcia Universidade Cat\u00f3lica de S\u00e3o Paulo, 2017. Dispon\u00edvel em:&nbsp;<a href=\"https:\/\/enciclopediajuridica.pucsp.br\/verbete\/494\/edicao-1\/nacionalidade\">https:\/\/enciclopediajuridica.pucsp.br\/verbete\/494\/edicao-1\/nacionalidade<\/a>. Acesso em: 5 set. 2024.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>ORGANIZA\u00c7\u00c3O DAS NA\u00c7\u00d5ES UNIDAS.&nbsp;<em><strong>Cinco coisas sobre ap\u00e1tridas<\/strong><\/em>, 2024. Dispon\u00edvel em:&nbsp;<a href=\"https:\/\/news.un.org\/pt\/story\/2024\/08\/1836261\">https:\/\/news.un.org\/pt\/story\/2024\/08\/1836261<\/a>. Acesso em: 5 set. 2024.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p><strong>WHO ARE STATELESS PEOPLE?<\/strong><strong><\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>Francielli Alice Nunes Coutinho<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>Nationality is the link that a person has with a State, generating a relationship of rights and duties between them. The Universal Declaration of Human Rights, in its article 15, defined that nationality is a right for everyone, without distinction.&nbsp;&nbsp;It turns out that, despite this security, thousands of people find themselves stateless, not being considered as holders of rights. Therefore, it is understood that the causes that lead a person to be considered stateless are diverse, but mainly occur due to ethnic and religious discrimination.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>The Convention relating to the Status of Stateless Persons defines them as \u201csomeone who is not considered a national by any State under the operation of its law\u201d. However, despite this definition, stateless people are still considered an invisible problem, as due to the lack of access to school, health, leisure and other basic guarantees, it is not easy to identify them. The lack of access to basic services demonstrates the vulnerability of these subjects, as they do not have any type of social and legal protection, making them vulnerable to exposure to risks and the lack of human dignity. In this context, there is a clash between the basic principles of human rights and the internal legislation of each country, as, for fundamental rights, it stands out that everyone, without distinction, is considered to have rights.&nbsp;<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>However, the legislation of each country also prevails, as they describe the characteristics necessary for each person to acquire nationality.&nbsp;To this end, in 1951, the UN Agency for Refugees (UNHCR) was founded, with the aim of identifying, preventing, reducing and guaranteeing the protection of these people. Offering support and aid to governments to implement policies that reduce the number of stateless people.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>As a result, some countries began to accept and join the UN Convention on Stateless Persons, hoping to reduce the numbers and provide these people with a sense of belonging, as well as guaranteeing them their rights as human beings.&nbsp;However, despite several discussions regarding the measures to be taken, the UNHCR, at the end of 2023, indicated that there are more than 4.4 million people identified as refugees around the world.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>Therefore, there is still a need for political and legislative changes on the subject to guarantee these people a feeling of recognition and belonging, as well as the possibility of exercising rights and duties.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>References<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>ACNUR BRASIL.&nbsp;<em><strong>Ap\u00e1tridas<\/strong><\/em>. Dispon\u00edvel em:&nbsp;<a href=\"https:\/\/www.acnur.org\/portugues\/quem-ajudamos\/apatridas\/\">https:\/\/www.acnur.org\/portugues\/quem-ajudamos\/apatridas\/<\/a>. Acesso em: 5 set. 2024.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>ACNUR BRASIL.&nbsp;<em><strong>ACNUR relata progresso pelo fim da apatridia<\/strong>, 2023<\/em>. Dispon\u00edvel em:&nbsp;<a href=\"https:\/\/www.acnur.org\/portugues\/2023\/11\/06\/acnur-relata-progresso-no-combate-a-apatridia\/#:~:text=Pelo%20menos%204%2C4%20milh%C3%B5es,nas%20estat%C3%ADsticas%20nacionais\">https:\/\/www.acnur.org\/portugues\/2023\/11\/06\/acnur-relata-progresso-no-combate-a-apatridia\/#:~:text=Pelo%20menos%204%2C4%20milh%C3%B5es,nas%20estat%C3%ADsticas%20nacionais<\/a>. Acesso em: 5 set. 2024.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>COUTO, Marilia Oliveira Leite; BRASIL, Deilton Ribeiro. A nacionalidade como um direito humano e os desafios da apatridia.&nbsp;<em><strong>Cadernos de Dereito Actual<\/strong><\/em>, n. 13, p. 117-131, 2020. ISSN 2340-860X. ISSNe 2386-5229. Dispon\u00edvel em:&nbsp;<a href=\"https:\/\/cadernosdedereitoactual.es\/ojs\/index.php\/cadernos\/article\/view\/460\/271\">https:\/\/cadernosdedereitoactual.es\/ojs\/index.php\/cadernos\/article\/view\/460\/271<\/a>. Acesso em: 5 set. 2024.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>HUSEK, Carlos Roberto. Nacionalidade. In: CAMPILONGO, Celso Fernandes; GONZAGA, Alvaro de Azevedo; FREIRE, Andr\u00e9 Luiz (coords.).&nbsp;<em><strong>Enciclop\u00e9dia jur\u00eddica da PUC-SP<\/strong><\/em>. Tomo: Direito Internacional. Coord. de tomo: Cl\u00e1udio Finkelstein; Clarisse Laupman Ferraz Lima. 1. ed. S\u00e3o Paulo: Pontif\u00edcia Universidade Cat\u00f3lica de S\u00e3o Paulo, 2017. Dispon\u00edvel em:&nbsp;<a href=\"https:\/\/enciclopediajuridica.pucsp.br\/verbete\/494\/edicao-1\/nacionalidade\">https:\/\/enciclopediajuridica.pucsp.br\/verbete\/494\/edicao-1\/nacionalidade<\/a>. Acesso em: 5 set. 2024.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>ORGANIZA\u00c7\u00c3O DAS NA\u00c7\u00d5ES UNIDAS.&nbsp;<em><strong>Cinco coisas sobre ap\u00e1tridas<\/strong><\/em>, 2024. Dispon\u00edvel em:&nbsp;<a href=\"https:\/\/news.un.org\/pt\/story\/2024\/08\/1836261\">https:\/\/news.un.org\/pt\/story\/2024\/08\/1836261<\/a>. Acesso em: 5 set. 2024.<strong><\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n<p><strong>NOT\u00cdCIA DA CORTE INTERNACIONAL DE JUSTI\u00c7A<\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>EIXO:<strong>&nbsp;&nbsp;<\/strong>CIDADANIA GLOBAL<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p><strong>PARECER CONSULTIVO DE 30 DE JULHO DE 2024 DA CORTE INTERNACIONAL DE JUSTI\u00c7A SOBRE O CASO DE GENOC\u00cdDIO ENTRE A UCR\u00c2NIA E A FEDERA\u00c7\u00c3O RUSSA&nbsp;<\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>Taciana Cec\u00edlia Ramos&nbsp;<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>&nbsp;A Corte Internacional de Justi\u00e7a (CIJ), \u00f3rg\u00e3o jurisdicional de c\u00fapula da Organiza\u00e7\u00e3o das Na\u00e7\u00f5es Unidas (ONU), emitiu em 30 de julho de 2024 um Parecer Consultivo relacionado ao caso intitulado, em tradu\u00e7\u00e3o livre, como \u201cAlega\u00e7\u00f5es de genoc\u00eddio sob a Conven\u00e7\u00e3o sobre a Preven\u00e7\u00e3o e Puni\u00e7\u00e3o do Crime de Genoc\u00eddio (Ucr\u00e2nia v. Federa\u00e7\u00e3o Russa)\u201d.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>&nbsp;Tal Parecer versa sobre o encaminhamento processual da CIJ na demanda movida pela Ucr\u00e2nia contra a Federa\u00e7\u00e3o Russa. Neste caso, o Estado Ucraniano aponta viola\u00e7\u00f5es russas \u00e0s disposi\u00e7\u00f5es da&nbsp;Conven\u00e7\u00e3o de 1948 para a Preven\u00e7\u00e3o e Puni\u00e7\u00e3o do Crime de Genoc\u00eddio, decorrentes do conflito internacional que eclodiu ap\u00f3s a invas\u00e3o da R\u00fassia no territ\u00f3rio da Ucr\u00e2nia, em 26 de fevereiro de 2022. A mencionada Conven\u00e7\u00e3o de 1948&nbsp;estabelece defini\u00e7\u00f5es e obriga\u00e7\u00f5es estatais para coibir o cometimento de genoc\u00eddio, sendo que, nos termos do artigo IX desta normativa, compete \u00e0 Corte Internacional de Justi\u00e7a&nbsp;interpretar, aplicar e executar esta Conven\u00e7\u00e3o.&nbsp;<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>Nesta an\u00e1lise, assim, inicialmente a aludida Corte fixou o dia 2 de agosto de 2024 como prazo para a apresenta\u00e7\u00e3o do Contra-Memorial da Federa\u00e7\u00e3o Russa no \u00e2mbito desse processo. Ocorreu que a defesa russa requereu dila\u00e7\u00e3o do mencionado prazo para essa provid\u00eancia at\u00e9&nbsp;&nbsp;o dia 02 de fevereiro de 2025, alegando que a complexidade do caso trouxe quest\u00f5es de fato envolvendo evid\u00eancias volumosas, incluindo depoimentos de testemunhas de pessoas que residem em \u00e1reas afetadas por conflitos armados em andamento, bem como se relaciona a processos paralelos entre as partes existentes em outras inst\u00e2ncias, fora o grande n\u00famero de declara\u00e7\u00f5es de interven\u00e7\u00e3o interpostas nesta demanda.&nbsp;<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>A Ucr\u00e2nia se manifestou pela rejei\u00e7\u00e3o deste pedido russo, por\u00e9m, o&nbsp;entendimento da CIJ no referido Parecer foi o de prorrogar at\u00e9 16 de setembro de 2024 o prazo para a apresenta\u00e7\u00e3o do Contra-Memorial russo, postergando para o final do processo sua decis\u00e3o definitiva.&nbsp;<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>REFER\u00caNCIA:<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>BRASIL. Decreto n\u00ba 30.822, de 6 de maio de 1952. Promulga a Conven\u00e7\u00e3o para a Preven\u00e7\u00e3o e a Repress\u00e3o do Crime de Genoc\u00eddio, conclu\u00edda em Paris, a 11 de dezembro de 1948, por ocasi\u00e3o da III Sess\u00e3o da Assembl\u00e9ia Geral das Na\u00e7\u00f5es Unidas. Rio de Janeiro, RJ:&nbsp;<strong>Di\u00e1rio Oficial da Uni\u00e3o<\/strong>, 09 mai. 1952. Dispon\u00edvel em:<strong>&nbsp;<\/strong>DECRETO N\u00ba 30.822 (planalto.gov.br).&nbsp;Acesso em: 28 ago. 2024.&nbsp;<a href=\"https:\/\/icj-cij.org\/sites\/default\/files\/case-related\/186\/186-20240719-adv-01-00-en.pdf\"><strong><\/strong><\/a><\/p>\n\n\n\n<p><a href=\"https:\/\/icj-cij.org\/sites\/default\/files\/case-related\/186\/186-20240719-adv-01-00-en.pdf\">ICJ, International Court of Justice.&nbsp;<\/a><a href=\"https:\/\/icj-cij.org\/sites\/default\/files\/case-related\/186\/186-20240719-adv-01-00-en.pdf\"><strong>Advisory Opinion of 30 July 2024.<\/strong><\/a><a href=\"https:\/\/icj-cij.org\/sites\/default\/files\/case-related\/186\/186-20240719-adv-01-00-en.pdf\">&nbsp;<\/a><a href=\"https:\/\/icj-cij.org\/case\/182\">Allegations of Genocide under the Convention on the Prevention and Punishment of the Crime of Genocide (Ukraine v. Russian Federation)<\/a><a href=\"https:\/\/icj-cij.org\/sites\/default\/files\/case-related\/186\/186-20240719-adv-01-00-en.pdf\">. 30 jul.2024. Dispon\u00edvel em: Judgments, Advisory Opinions and Orders | INTERNATIONAL COURT OF JUSTICE (icj-cij.org) Acesso em: 28 ago. 2024.&nbsp;<\/a><\/p>\n\n\n\n<p><a href=\"https:\/\/icj-cij.org\/sites\/default\/files\/case-related\/186\/186-20240719-adv-01-00-en.pdf\">&nbsp;<\/a><\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>THEMATIC AXIS:&nbsp;GLOBAL CITIZENSHIP&nbsp;<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p><strong>ADVISORY OPINION OF 30 JULY 2024 OF THE INTERNATIONAL COURT OF JUSTICE ON THE CASE OF GENOCIDE BETWEEN UKRAINE AND THE RUSSIAN FEDERATION<\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>Taciana Cec\u00edlia Ramos&nbsp;<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>On July 30, 2024, the International Court of Justice (ICJ), the highest jurisdictional body of the United Nations (UN), issued an Advisory Opinion related to the case entitled, in free translation, as &#8220;Allegations of genocide under the Convention on the Prevention and Punishment of the Crime of Genocide (Ukraine v. Russian Federation)&#8221;.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p><a><\/a>This Opinion deals with the ICJ&#8217;s procedural referral in the lawsuit filed by Ukraine against the Russian Federation. In this case, the Ukrainian State points out Russian violations of the provisions of the 1948 Convention on the Prevention and Punishment of the Crime of Genocide, arising from the international conflict that erupted after Russia&#8217;s invasion of the territory of Ukraine, on February 26, 2022. The aforementioned 1948 Convention establishes definitions and state obligations to curb the commission of genocide, and under the terms of Article IX of this regulation, it is the responsibility of the International Court of Justice to interpret, apply and execute this Convention.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>In this analysis, therefore, the aforementioned Court initially set August 2, 2024 as the deadline for the submission of the Counter-Memorial of the Russian Federation in the context of this process. It so happened that the Russian defense requested an extension of the aforementioned deadline for this measure until February 2, 2025, alleging that the complexity of the case brought questions of fact involving voluminous evidence, including witness statements from people residing in areas affected by ongoing armed conflicts, as well as related to parallel proceedings between the parties existing in other instances,&nbsp;&nbsp;apart from the large number of statements of intervention filed in this demand.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>Ukraine expressed its rejection of this Russian request, however, the ICJ&#8217;s understanding in the aforementioned Opinion was to extend until September 16, 2024 the deadline for the presentation of the Russian Counter-Memorial, postponing its final decision to the end of the process.&nbsp;<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>REFERENCE:<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>BRAZIL. Decree No 30,822, of May 6, 1952. Promulgates the Convention on the Prevention and Punishment of the Crime of Genocide, concluded in Paris on December 11, 1948, on the occasion of the Third Session of the General Assembly of the United Nations.&nbsp;Rio de Janeiro, RJ:&nbsp;<strong>Di\u00e1rio Oficial da Uni\u00e3o<\/strong>, 09 mai. 1952. Available at: DECREE No. 30,822 (planalto.gov.br).&nbsp;Accessed on: 28 Aug. 2024.&nbsp;<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>ICJ, International Court of Justice.&nbsp;<strong>Advisory Opinion of 30 July 2024<\/strong>. Allegations of Genocide under the Convention on the Prevention and Punishment of the Crime of Genocide (Ukraine v. Russian Federation). 30 Jul.2024. Available at: Judgments, Advisory Opinions and Orders | INTERNATIONAL COURT OF JUSTICE (icj-cij.org) Accessed on: 28 Aug. 2024.&nbsp;<strong><\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n<p><strong>NOT\u00cdCIAS DO SISTEMA INTERAMERICANO DE DIREITOS HUMANOS.<\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n<ul class=\"wp-block-list\">\n<li>COMISS\u00c3O INTERAMERICANA DE DIREITOS HUMANOS<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n\n\n\n<p>EIXO: Cidadania Global<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p><strong>A NECESSIDADE DO ENFRENTAMENTO AO NEGACIONISMO PELOS ESTADOS PARA POL\u00cdTICAS P\u00daBLICAS DE COMBATE AO DESAPARECIMENTO FOR\u00c7ADO E PRESERVA\u00c7\u00c3O DOS DIREITOS HUMANOS<\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>Nat\u00e1lia Marques Andrade<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>O dia 30 de agosto \u00e9 a data oficializada pela ONU para lembrar e conscientizar sobre as v\u00edtimas de desaparecimento for\u00e7ado,&nbsp;homenageando&nbsp;aqueles que passaram por grandes atrocidades, caracterizadas por viol\u00eancia, tortura e medo constante,<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>Essa data tamb\u00e9m tem o objetivo de empenhar os governos a implementar medidas para coibir essa pr\u00e1tica estarrecedora, que n\u00e3o \u00e9 restrita a uma parte espec\u00edfica do mundo e que na maioria dos locais em foi praticada, est\u00e1 associada a regimes ditatoriais, onde h\u00e1 conflito, repress\u00e3o e impunidade.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>&nbsp;A Comiss\u00e3o Interamericana de Direitos Humanos, por ocasi\u00e3o do Dia Internacional das V\u00edtimas de Desaparecimento For\u00e7ado, pede aos Estados que refutem informa\u00e7\u00f5es manipuladas, teorias conspirat\u00f3rias, sem comprova\u00e7\u00e3o, relativistas ou negacionistas acerca de viola\u00e7\u00f5es graves de direitos humanos, visto que essas posturas contrariam o direito internacional e os deveres dos Estados de garantir a verdade, preservar a mem\u00f3ria hist\u00f3rica, dignificar as v\u00edtimas, esclarecer o destino dos desaparecidos, investigar e punir os respons\u00e1veis, al\u00e9m de assegurar repara\u00e7\u00f5es \u00e0s v\u00edtimas e suas fam\u00edlias.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>Nos \u00faltimos tempos, houve um aumento de narrativas negacionistas, minimizando ou justificando graves viola\u00e7\u00f5es de direitos humanos, inclusive os desaparecimentos for\u00e7ados, bem como negando a exist\u00eancias de ditaduras e conflitos armados, apoiando antigos agentes de Estado que foram condenados por viola\u00e7\u00f5es como essas citadas.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>O negacionismo compromete o dever do Estado de prevenir novas viola\u00e7\u00f5es e pode fomentar mais abusos de direitos humanos, enfraquecendo pol\u00edticas p\u00fablicas destinadas a impedir esses crimes, assim a Comiss\u00e3o Interamericana de Direitos Humanos orienta que os Estados adotem uma abordagem em mem\u00f3ria dos fatos hist\u00f3ricos, promovendo a cria\u00e7\u00e3o de arquivos p\u00fablicos, iniciativas educacionais e locais de lembran\u00e7a que preservem a mem\u00f3ria das v\u00edtimas e fomentem uma cultura de respeito aos direitos humanos.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>\u00c9 preciso que os governos condenem as narrativas que violem os direitos humanos, criando e atuando com pol\u00edticas p\u00fablicas voltadas a garantir que crimes como desaparecimentos for\u00e7ados n\u00e3o se repitam, fortalecendo o compromisso da sociedade com os valores democr\u00e1ticos.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>Refer\u00eancias:<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>ORGANIZATION OF AMERICAN STATES.&nbsp;<strong>IACHR calls for States to guarantee access to justice and integral reparations to victims of forced disappearances<\/strong>.&nbsp;2024. Dispon\u00edvel em:&nbsp;<a href=\"https:\/\/www.oas.org\/en\/IACHR\/jsForm\/?File=\/en\/iachr\/media_center\/PReleases\/2024\/200.asp\">https:\/\/www.oas.org\/en\/IACHR\/jsForm\/?File=\/en\/iachr\/media_center\/PReleases\/2024\/200.asp<\/a>. Acesso em: 5 set. 2024.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>ORGANIZA\u00c7\u00c3O DOS ESTADOS AMERICANOS.&nbsp;<strong>CIDH denuncia a persist\u00eancia de desaparecimentos for\u00e7ados na Am\u00e9rica Latina e no Caribe<\/strong>. 2021. Dispon\u00edvel em:&nbsp;<a href=\"https:\/\/www.oas.org\/pt\/cidh\/jsForm\/?File=\/pt\/cidh\/prensa\/notas\/2021\/224.asp\">https:\/\/www.oas.org\/pt\/cidh\/jsForm\/?File=\/pt\/cidh\/prensa\/notas\/2021\/224.asp<\/a>.&nbsp;Acesso em: 5 set. 2024.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p><strong>THE NEED FOR STATES TO ADDRESS DENIALISM FOR THE IMPLEMENTATION OF PUBLIC POLICIES AGAINST FORCED DISAPPEARANCES AND THE PRESERVATION OF HUMAN RIGHTS<\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>Nat\u00e1lia Marques Andrade<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>On August 30th is the official date recognized by the UN to remember and raise awareness about the victims of forced disappearances, honoring those who endured great atrocities, characterized by violence, torture, and constant fear.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>This date also aims to encourage governments to implement measures to prevent this alarming practice, which is not confined to a specific part of the world and, in most places where it has occurred, is associated with dictatorial regimes, where there is conflict, repression, and impunity.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>On the occasion of the International Day of Victims of Forced Disappearances, the Inter-American Commission on Human Rights calls on States to reject manipulated information, unfounded conspiracy theories, relativist or denialist narratives regarding serious human rights violations. These positions contradict international law and the obligations of States to ensure the truth, preserve historical memory, dignify the victims, clarify the fate of the disappeared, investigate and punish those responsible, and provide reparations to the victims and their families.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>In recent times, there has been an increase in denialist narratives, minimizing or justifying serious human rights violations, including forced disappearances, as well as denying the existence of dictatorships and armed conflicts, and supporting former state agents convicted of such violations.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>Denialism undermines the State&#8217;s duty to prevent further violations and can lead to more human rights abuses, weakening public policies designed to prevent these crimes. Thus, the Inter-American Commission on Human Rights advises States to adopt an approach that honors historical facts, promoting the creation of public archives, educational initiatives, and memorial sites that preserve the memory of the victims and foster a culture of respect for human rights.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>Governments must condemn narratives that violate human rights, creating and implementing public policies aimed at ensuring that crimes such as forced disappearances are not repeated, strengthening society&#8217;s commitment to democratic values.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>References<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>ORGANIZATION OF AMERICAN STATES.&nbsp;<strong>IACHR calls for States to guarantee access to justice and integral reparations to victims of forced disappearances<\/strong>.&nbsp;2024. Dispon\u00edvel em:&nbsp;<a href=\"https:\/\/www.oas.org\/en\/IACHR\/jsForm\/?File=\/en\/iachr\/media_center\/PReleases\/2024\/200.asp\">https:\/\/www.oas.org\/en\/IACHR\/jsForm\/?File=\/en\/iachr\/media_center\/PReleases\/2024\/200.asp<\/a>. Acesso em: 5 set. 2024.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>ORGANIZA\u00c7\u00c3O DOS ESTADOS AMERICANOS.&nbsp;<strong>CIDH denuncia a persist\u00eancia de desaparecimentos for\u00e7ados na Am\u00e9rica Latina e no Caribe.<\/strong>&nbsp;2021. Dispon\u00edvel em:&nbsp;<a href=\"https:\/\/www.oas.org\/pt\/cidh\/jsForm\/?File=\/pt\/cidh\/prensa\/notas\/2021\/224.asp\">https:\/\/www.oas.org\/pt\/cidh\/jsForm\/?File=\/pt\/cidh\/prensa\/notas\/2021\/224.asp<\/a>. Acesso em: 5 set. 2024.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<ul class=\"wp-block-list\">\n<li>CORTE INTERAMERICANA DE DIREITOS HUMANOS<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n\n\n\n<p>EIXO:&nbsp;CIDADANIA GLOBAL<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p><strong>CUMPRIMENTO DE SENTEN\u00c7AS NOS CASOS&nbsp;<em>NISSEN PESSOLANI<\/em>&nbsp;VS. PARAGUAI E&nbsp;<em>HUAC\u00d3N BAIDAL<\/em>&nbsp;E OUTROS VS. EQUADOR<\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>Val\u00e9ria Em\u00edlia de Aquino<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>Em 2 de Julho de 2024, a Corte Interamericana de Direitos Humanos emitiu duas resolu\u00e7\u00f5es sobre supervis\u00e3o de cumprimento de senten\u00e7a: uma sobre o Caso&nbsp;<em>Nissen Pessolani<\/em>&nbsp;vs. Paraguai (senten\u00e7a emitida em 30 de Agosto de 2023); e a outra sobre o Caso&nbsp;<em>Huac\u00f3n Baidal<\/em>&nbsp;e outros vs. Equador (senten\u00e7a homologat\u00f3ria de acordo emitida em 4 de Outubro de 2022).<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>No primeiro caso, a Corte condenou o Paraguai: a) \u00e0 elimina\u00e7\u00e3o de qualquer registro p\u00fablico da condena\u00e7\u00e3o disciplinaria de remo\u00e7\u00e3o do requerente do cargo de fiscal; b) \u00e0 publica\u00e7\u00e3o e difus\u00e3o da senten\u00e7a no di\u00e1rio oficial, bem como o seu resumo oficial; c) ao pagamento de indeniza\u00e7\u00e3o restitutiva por n\u00e3o reincorpora\u00e7\u00e3o ao cargo, indeniza\u00e7\u00f5es por danos morais e materiais, al\u00e9m da restitui\u00e7\u00e3o custas e gastos; e, d) \u00e0 reintegra\u00e7\u00e3o ao Fundo de Assist\u00eancia Legal das V\u00edtimas. A Corte identificou como tendo sido satisfeitas tais obriga\u00e7\u00f5es, contudo, destacando reformas na mencionada publica\u00e7\u00e3o, al\u00e9m de fazer observa\u00e7\u00f5es quanto ao cumprimento.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>No segundo caso, a Corte condenou o Equador: a) \u00e0 publica\u00e7\u00e3o da senten\u00e7a de homologa\u00e7\u00e3o de solu\u00e7\u00e3o amistosa e do acordo entre as partes, com resumo do caso, publica\u00e7\u00e3o esta que se encontra pendente; e, b) ao pagamento de indeniza\u00e7\u00e3o por danos morais, ponto este que foi integralmente cumprido. Por fim, a Corte observou que ainda cabe ao pa\u00eds o respeito \u00e0s demais observa\u00e7\u00f5es feitas.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>REFER\u00caNCIAS:<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>CORTE IDH.&nbsp;<em>Caso Huac\u00f3n Baidal y Otros vs. Ecuador<\/em>:&nbsp;<strong>Supervisi\u00f3n de Cumplimiento de Sentencia<\/strong>. Dispon\u00edvel em: https:\/\/corteidh.or.cr\/docs\/supervisiones\/huacon_baidal_02_07_24.pdf. Acesso em: 21. Ago. 2024.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>CORTE IDH.&nbsp;<em>Caso Nissen Pessolani vs. Paraguay<\/em>:&nbsp;<strong>Supervisi\u00f3n de Cumplimiento de Sentencia<\/strong>. Dispon\u00edvel em: https:\/\/corteidh.or.cr\/docs\/supervisiones\/nissen_pessolani_02_07_24.pdf. Acesso em: 21 Ago. 2024.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>THEMATIC AXIS:&nbsp;GLOBAL CITIZENSHIP<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p><strong>COMPLIANCE WITH JUDGMENTS IN THE CASES OF NISSEN PESSOLANI VS. PARAGUAY AND HUAC\u00d3N BAIDAL ET AL. VS. ECUADOR<\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>Val\u00e9ria Em\u00edlia de Aquino&nbsp;<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>On July 2, 2024, the Inter-American Court of Human Rights issued two resolutions concerning the supervision of compliance with judgments: one on the case of Nissen Pessolani vs. Paraguay (judgment issued on August 30, 2023) and the other on the case of Huac\u00f3n Baidal et al. vs. Ecuador (judgment approving a settlement agreement issued on October 4, 2022).&nbsp;<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>In the first case, the Court ordered Paraguay to: a) remove any public record of the disciplinary conviction that resulted in the applicant&#8217;s removal from the position of prosecutor; b) publish and disseminate the judgment in the official gazette, including its official summary; c) pay compensatory damages for not reinstating the applicant to the position, as well as compensation for moral and material damages, along with the reimbursement of costs and expenses; and d) reinstate the applicant to the Legal Assistance Fund for Victims. The Court identified that these obligations had been met, although it highlighted the need for revisions to the mentioned publication and made additional observations regarding compliance.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>&nbsp;In the second case, the Court ordered Ecuador to: a) publish the judgment approving the amicable settlement and the agreement between the parties, including a summary of the case, a publication that remains pending; and b) pay compensation for moral damages, which has been fully complied with. Finally, the Court noted that the country must still respect the other observations made.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>REFERENCES:<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>CORTE IDH.&nbsp;<em>Caso Huac\u00f3n Baidal y Otros vs. Ecuador<\/em>:&nbsp;<strong>Supervisi\u00f3n de Cumplimiento de Sentencia<\/strong>. Dispon\u00edvel em: https:\/\/corteidh.or.cr\/docs\/supervisiones\/huacon_baidal_02_07_24.pdf. Acesso em: 21. Ago. 2024.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>CORTE IDH.&nbsp;<em>Caso Nissen Pessolani vs. Paraguay<\/em>:&nbsp;<strong>Supervisi\u00f3n de Cumplimiento de Sentencia<\/strong>.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<ul class=\"wp-block-list\">\n<li>ORGANIZA\u00c7\u00c3O DOS ESTADOS AMERICANOS<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n\n\n\n<p>EIXO: CIDADANIA GLOBAL<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p><strong>A CIDADANIA GLOBAL DA PESSOA HUMANA IDOSA NO \u00c2MBITO DOS POVOS ORIGIN\u00c1RIOS E A CONVEN\u00c7\u00c3O INTERAMERICANA SOBRE A PROTE\u00c7\u00c3O DOS DIREITOS HUMANOS DAS PESSOAS IDOSAS<\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>Jo\u00e3o Paulo Iotti Cruz<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>No \u00faltimo m\u00eas de agosto, no dia 08, a OEA (Organiza\u00e7\u00e3o dos Estados Americanos) atrav\u00e9s de grupo constitu\u00eddo de especialistas, realizou debate interseccional de forma remota com o objetivo de&nbsp; &#8220;[&#8230;] promover, proteger e garantir o pleno exerc\u00edcio dos direitos das Pessoas Idosas, em sua diversidade etnico-racial, de g\u00eanero e outras formas de disparidade&#8221; (OEA, 2024, tradu\u00e7\u00e3o nossa). Um dos temas centrais de destaque foi a import\u00e2ncia da discuss\u00e3o sobre as pessoas idosas e povos origin\u00e1rios das am\u00e9ricas. O evento virtual teve como organizadores o Departamento de Inclus\u00e3o (OEA), Organiza\u00e7\u00e3o Panamericana da Sa\u00fade (OPS) e a Comiss\u00e3o Econ\u00f4mica da Am\u00e9rica Latina e Caribe (CEPAL) (OPS, 2024).<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>A discuss\u00e3o sobre o tema, com naturalidade, desdobra-se&nbsp;em \u00e2mbito interamericano, uma vez publicado, em 2015, a Conven\u00e7\u00e3o Interamericana sobre a Prote\u00e7\u00e3o dos Direitos Humanos das Pessoas Idosas (OEA, 2015). Em cap\u00edtulo espec\u00edfico, de n\u00famero 4, a Conven\u00e7\u00e3o \u00e9 clara ao materializar a preocupa\u00e7\u00e3o com o acesso aos direitos m\u00ednimos e a necessidade de desenvolvimento de &#8220;[&#8230;] pol\u00edticas, planos e legisla\u00e7\u00f5es sobre envelhecimento e velhice, com rela\u00e7\u00e3o aos idosos em condi\u00e7\u00e3o de vulnerabilidade e os que s\u00e3o v\u00edtimas de discrimina\u00e7\u00e3o m\u00faltipla&#8221; (OEA, 2015, p. 17). Incluindo, os povos origin\u00e1rios no rol de prote\u00e7\u00e3o.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>No \u00e2mbito brasileiro, \u00e9 importante destacar que o Brasil foi um dos primeiros pa\u00edses a assinar, no entanto, at\u00e9 o momento n\u00e3o ratificou a respectiva Conven\u00e7\u00e3o.&nbsp;&nbsp;Tamb\u00e9m vale ressaltar que o tema, historicamente, possui sua import\u00e2ncia como forma de garantia de cidadania e repercuss\u00f5es globais, como exemplo, podemos recortar princ\u00edpios globais previstos no Plano de A\u00e7\u00e3o Internacional de Madri sobre o envelhecimento (2002) e Global Report on Ageism (ONU, 2022) e diversos outros diplomas, evidenciando a necessidade de ampliar o debate de forma global e buscar a coopera\u00e7\u00e3o internacional e regional.&nbsp;<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>Refer\u00eancias:<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>HERRMANN, M. E. C.&nbsp;<strong>A Conven\u00e7\u00e3o Interamericana sobre Prote\u00e7\u00e3o dos Direitos Humanos das Pessoas Idosas e sua import\u00e2ncia para o Direito Brasileiro<\/strong>. Disserta\u00e7\u00e3o Mestrado&nbsp; defendida no programa de P\u00f3s-Gradua\u00e7\u00e3o em Direitos Humanos na Faculdade de Direitos da Universidade de S\u00e3o Paulo. S\u00e3o Paulo. 2020.&nbsp;<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>OEA. Organization of American States. General Assembly. Regular Session. (45th : 2015 : Washington, D.C.).&nbsp;<strong>Inter-American Convention on Protecting the Human Rights of Older Persons (2015)<\/strong>. 2. Older people&#8211;Civil rights&#8211;America. 3. Older people&#8211;Legal status, laws, etc.&#8211;America. 4. Human rights. &lt;https:\/\/www.oas.org\/en\/sare\/documents\/CIPM_POR.pdf&gt;<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>OMS. Organiza\u00e7\u00e3o Mundial da Sa\u00fade. Relat\u00f3rio mundial sobre o idadismo. Washington, D.C.: Organiza\u00e7\u00e3o Pan-Americana da Sa\u00fade; 2022. Licen\u00e7a: CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO. &lt;https:\/\/doi.org\/10.37774\/9789275724453&gt;.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>OPS &#8211; Organizaci\u00f3n Panamericana de la Salud. Personas mayores ind\u00edgenas: realidades y desaf\u00edos \/ 8 de agosto de 2024, 2:00pm (EDT). Dispon\u00edvel em: https:\/\/www.paho.org\/es\/eventos\/personas-mayores-indigenas-realidades-desafios-8-agosto-2024-200pm-edt.Acesso em: 01\/09\/2024.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p><strong>GLOBAL CITIZENSHIP OF OLDER PERSONS IN THE CONTEXT OF INDIGENOUS PEOPLES AND THE INTER-AMERICAN CONVENTION ON THE PROTECTION OF THE HUMAN RIGHTS OF OLDER PERSONS<\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>Jo\u00e3o Paulo Iotti Cruz<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>Last August, on the 8th, the OAS (Organization of American States), through a group of experts, held a remote intersectional debate with the aim of \u201c[&#8230;] promoting, protecting and guaranteeing the full exercise of the rights of Older Persons, in their ethnic-racial, gender and other forms of disparity diversity\u201d (OAS, 2024). One of the central themes highlighted was the importance of the discussion on older people and native peoples of the Americas. The virtual event was organized by the Department of Inclusion (OAS), the Pan American Health Organization (PAHO) and the Economic Commission for Latin America and the Caribbean (ECLAC) (PAHO, 2024).<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>The discussion on the subject has naturally spread to the inter-American level, since the Inter-American Convention on the Protection of the Human Rights of Older Persons was published in 2015 (OAS, 2015). In a specific chapter, number 4, the Convention is clear in its concern for access to minimum rights and the need to develop \u201c[&#8230;] policies, plans and legislation on ageing and old age, with regard to vulnerable older persons and those who are victims of multiple discrimination\u201d (OAS, 2015, p. 17). Including native peoples in the list of protections.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>At the Brazilian level, it is important to note that Brazil was one of the first countries to sign but has not yet ratified the Convention.&nbsp;&nbsp;It is also worth noting that the issue has historically been important as a way of guaranteeing citizenship and has global repercussions, such as the global principles set out in the Madrid International Plan of Action on Ageing (2002) and the Global Report on Ageism (UN, 2022) and various other pieces of legislation, highlighting the need to broaden the debate globally and seek international and regional cooperation.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>Reference<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>HERRMANN, M. E. C.&nbsp;<strong>A Conven\u00e7\u00e3o Interamericana sobre Prote\u00e7\u00e3o dos Direitos Humanos das Pessoas Idosas e sua import\u00e2ncia para o Direito Brasileiro<\/strong>. Disserta\u00e7\u00e3o Mestrado&nbsp; defendida no programa de P\u00f3s-Gradua\u00e7\u00e3o em Direitos Humanos na Faculdade de Direitos da Universidade de S\u00e3o Paulo.&nbsp;S\u00e3o Paulo. 2020.&nbsp;<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>OEA. Organization of American States. General Assembly. Regular Session. (45th : 2015 : Washington, D.C.).&nbsp;<strong>Inter-American Convention on Protecting the Human Rights of Older Persons (2015)<\/strong>. 2. Older people&#8211;Civil rights&#8211;America. 3. Older people&#8211;Legal status, laws, etc.&#8211;America. 4. Human rights. &lt;https:\/\/www.oas.org\/en\/sare\/documents\/CIPM_POR.pdf&gt;<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>OMS. Organiza\u00e7\u00e3o Mundial da Sa\u00fade.&nbsp;<strong>Relat\u00f3rio mundial sobre o idadismo<\/strong>. Washington, D.C.: Organiza\u00e7\u00e3o Pan-Americana da Sa\u00fade; 2022. Licen\u00e7a: CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO. &lt;https:\/\/doi.org\/10.37774\/9789275724453&gt;.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>OPS. Organizaci\u00f3n Panamericana de la Salud.&nbsp;<strong>Personas mayores ind\u00edgenas:<\/strong>&nbsp;realidades y desaf\u00edos \/ 8 de agosto de 2024, 2:00pm (EDT). Dispon\u00edvel em: https:\/\/www.paho.org\/es\/eventos\/personas-mayores-indigenas-realidades-desafios-8-agosto-2024-200pm-edt.Acesso em: 01\/09\/2024.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p><strong>NOT\u00cdCIAS<\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n<p><strong>FIQUEM ATENTOS AO INSTAGRAM DO PROJETO GLOBAL CROSSINGS PARA NOVIDADES&nbsp;<\/strong><strong><em>@GLOBAL_CROSSINGS<\/em><\/strong><strong><em><\/em><\/strong><strong><\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n<p><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>NEWSLETTER AGOSTO\/2024 C\u00c1TEDRA JEAN MONNET UNIVERSIDADE FEDERAL DE UBERL\u00c2NDIA &nbsp;PROJETO GLOBAL CROSSINGS COORDENA\u00c7\u00c3O:&nbsp;PROFA. CLAUDIA LOUREIRO ORGANIZA\u00c7\u00c3O E EDI\u00c7\u00c3O:&nbsp;PEDRO LUCCHETTI; THIAGO ROMERO NOT\u00cdCIAS DA UNI\u00c3O EUROPEIA UNI\u00c3O EUROPEIA NO COMBATE AOS INC\u00caNDIOS FLORESTAIS Danielle Mansur Guimar\u00e3es Os inc\u00eandios florestais em Portugal, Fran\u00e7a, Espanha, Gr\u00e9cia, Alb\u00e2nia e outros pa\u00edses da Uni\u00e3o Europeia t\u00eam se tornado cada vez [&hellip;]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":919,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[13,5,12],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-1062","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-en-newsletter","category-newsletter","category-ptbr-newsletter"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.globalcrossings.com.br\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/1062","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.globalcrossings.com.br\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.globalcrossings.com.br\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.globalcrossings.com.br\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.globalcrossings.com.br\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=1062"}],"version-history":[{"count":1,"href":"https:\/\/www.globalcrossings.com.br\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/1062\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":1063,"href":"https:\/\/www.globalcrossings.com.br\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/1062\/revisions\/1063"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.globalcrossings.com.br\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/919"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.globalcrossings.com.br\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=1062"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.globalcrossings.com.br\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=1062"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.globalcrossings.com.br\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=1062"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}